Archive for June, 2008


June 17, 2008

Print this Page

Equal Access To Justice, Inc

Latest comments May 19, 2008 link at bottom of page

Two page easy print and fill-in form to register your comments with forest service is the fourth link down

(For comments and forms see links below this article)

In March, 2008, the United States Department of Agriculture – Forest Service published a Proposed Rule: AMENDMENT to Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 223, 228, 261, 292, and 293 and the OMB No. 0596-NEW. The Proposed Rules constitute a massive change to Forest Service’s Mining Regulations. We are convinced that, if enacted, as is, they would, effectively, curtail both, small scale commercial mining and recreational mineral collecting, altogether, in the National Forests. If this is the intent and effect of the Proposed Rules then, only your participation can prevent it from happening. Please participate and comment.
Public comments and information collection requirements comments are, both, due by May 27, 2008. (Federal Register Notice: Tuesday, March 25, 2008, (73 FR 15694).)
We, Equal Access to Justice, Inc., are submitting a substantive set of comments opposing both, the Proposed Rules and OMB No. 0596-NEW. We have provided a form, whereby, you can incorporate them, making our comments fully a part of your own, should you so choose.

Significant Proposed Changes to the Forest Service Mining Regulations are:

Forest Service has proclaimed that, in almost every single case, with very few exceptions, a plan of operations will be required where a notice of intent or bonded notice is required

A notice of intent, or bonded notice, is required for any mining, recreational mineral collecting, or reclamation, activity exceeding the few limitations allowed

The Proposed Rules do not allow anyone to be in any National Forest for longer than 14 days in a year, without an approved plan of operations

The Proposed Rules do not allow anyone to use any kind of mechanized equipment, for any, mining, recreational mineral collecting, or reclamation, activity, other than very simple battery operated equipment, without an approved plan of operations

The Proposed Rules do not allow anyone to use a suction dredge, without an approved plan of operations

The Proposed Rules do not allow anyone to perform any mining, recreational mineral collecting, or reclamation, activities, whatsoever, in the designated habitat of a threatened or endangered specie, without an approved plan of operations

Almost without exception, every part of every National Forest is in the designated habitat of a threatened or endangered specie

To obtain an approved plan of operations, one must provide a bond or the cash equivalent, beforehand

No surety, government or private, will provide a bond to small miners

Forest Service will hold the bond for 20 years

The bond must provide for restoring the land to its pre-civilization condition which is very costly to do

One cannot perform their own reclamation work

Reclamation must restore the land to its pre-civilization condition

Forest Service will not approve a plan of operations without preparing an environmental impact statement and it must be done by them (USDA-FS).

Forest Service does not have the staff or budget to perform environmental impact statements

Forest Service will not approve a plan of operations without performing a validity examination, and it must be done by them (USDA-FS).

Forest Service does not have the staff or budget to perform validity examinations

No one has passed a validity examination performed by the Forest Service

No one has passed a validity examination without an approved plan of operations in hand, beforehand

Failure to pass a validity examination nullifies the un-patented mining claim(s) for which validity was sought



June 17, 2008
                       ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

                    (Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992)

                                Annex III



     (a)   The subject of forests is related to the entire range of
environmental and development issues and opportunities, including the right
to socio-economic development on a sustainable basis.

     (b)   The guiding objective of these principles is to contribute to the
management, conservation and sustainable development of forests and to provide
for their multiple and complementary functions and uses.

     (c)   Forestry issues and opportunities should be examined in a holistic
and balanced manner within the overall context of environment and development,
taking into consideration the multiple functions and uses of forests,
including traditional uses, and the likely economic and social stress when
these uses are constrained or restricted, as well as the potential for
development that sustainable forest management can offer.

     (d)   These principles reflect a first global consensus on forests.  In
committing themselves to the prompt implementation of these principles,
countries also decide to keep them under assessment for their adequacy with
regard to further international cooperation on forest issues.

     (e)   These principles should apply to all types of forests, both
natural and planted, in all geographical regions and climatic zones, including
austral, boreal, subtemperate, temperate, subtropical and tropical.

     (f)   All types of forests embody complex and unique ecological
processes which are the basis for their present and potential capacity to
provide resources to satisfy human needs as well as environmental values, and
as such their sound management and conservation is of concern to the
Governments of the countries to which they belong and are of value to local
communities and to the environment as a whole.

     (g)   Forests are essential to economic development and the maintenance
of all forms of life.

     (h)   Recognizing that the responsibility for forest management,
conservation and sustainable development is in many States allocated among
federal/national, state/provincial and local levels of government, each State,
in accordance with its constitution and/or national legislation, should pursue
these principles at the appropriate level of government.


1.   (a)   States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations
and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their
own resources pursuant to their own environmental policies and have the
responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control
do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the
limits of national jurisdiction.

     (b)   The agreed full incremental cost of achieving benefits associated
with forest conservation and sustainable development requires increased
international cooperation and should be equitably shared by the international

2.   (a)   States have the sovereign and inalienable right to utilize, manage
and develop their forests in accordance with their development needs and level
of socio-economic development and on the basis of national policies consistent
with sustainable development and legislation, including the conversion of such
areas for other uses within the overall socio-economic development plan and
based on rational land-use policies.

     (b)   Forest resources and forest lands should be sustainably managed
to meet the social, economic, ecological, cultural and spiritual needs of
present and future generations.  These needs are for forest products and
services, such as wood and wood products, water, food, fodder, medicine, fuel,
shelter, employment, recreation, habitats for wildlife, landscape diversity,
carbon sinks and reservoirs, and for other forest products.  Appropriate
measures should be taken to protect forests against harmful effects of
pollution, including air-borne pollution, fires, pests and diseases, in order
to maintain their full multiple value.

     (c)   The provision of timely, reliable and accurate information on
forests and forest ecosystems is essential for public understanding and
informed decision-making and should be ensured.

     (d)   Governments should promote and provide opportunities for the
participation of interested parties, including local communities and
indigenous people, industries, labour, non-governmental organizations and
individuals, forest dwellers and women, in the development, implementation and
planning of national forest policies.

3.   (a)   National policies and strategies should provide a framework for
increased efforts, including the development and strengthening of institutions
and programmes for the management, conservation and sustainable development
of forests and forest lands.

     (b)   International institutional arrangements, building on those
organizations and mechanisms already in existence, as appropriate, should
facilitate international cooperation in the field of forests.

     (c)   All aspects of environmental protection and social and economic
development as they relate to forests and forest lands should be integrated
and comprehensive.

4.   The vital role of all types of forests in maintaining the ecological
processes and balance at the local, national, regional and global levels
through, inter alia, their role in protecting fragile ecosystems, watersheds
and freshwater resources and as rich storehouses of biodiversity and
biological resources and sources of genetic material for biotechnology
products, as well as photosynthesis, should be recognized.

5.   (a)   National forest policies should recognize and duly support the
identity, culture and the rights of indigenous people, their communities and
other communities and forest dwellers.  Appropriate conditions should be
promoted for these groups to enable them to have an economic stake in forest
use, perform economic activities, and achieve and maintain cultural identity
and social organization, as well as adequate levels of livelihood and
well-being, through, inter alia, those land tenure arrangements which serve
as incentives for the sustainable management of forests.

     (b)   The full participation of women in all aspects of the management,
conservation and sustainable development of forests should be actively

6.   (a)   All types of forests play an important role in meeting energy
requirements through the provision of a renewable source of bio-energy,
particularly in developing countries, and the demands for fuelwood for
household and industrial needs should be met through sustainable forest
management, afforestation and reforestation.  To this end, the potential
contribution of plantations of both indigenous and introduced species for the
provision of both fuel and industrial wood should be recognized.

     (b)   National policies and programmes should take into account the
relationship, where it exists, between the conservation, management and
sustainable development of forests and all aspects related to the production,
consumption, recycling and/or final disposal of forest products.

     (c)   Decisions taken on the management, conservation and sustainable
development of forest resources should benefit, to the extent practicable,
from a comprehensive assessment of economic and non-economic values of forest
goods and services and of the environmental costs and benefits.  The
development and improvement of methodologies for such evaluations should be

     (d)   The role of planted forests and permanent agricultural crops as
sustainable and environmentally sound sources of renewable energy and
industrial raw material should be recognized, enhanced and promoted.  Their
contribution to the maintenance of ecological processes, to offsetting
pressure on primary/old-growth forest and to providing regional employment and
development with the adequate involvement of local inhabitants should be
recognized and enhanced.

     (e)   Natural forests also constitute a source of goods and services,
and their conservation, sustainable management and use should be promoted.

7.   (a)   Efforts should be made to promote a supportive international
economic climate conducive to sustained and environmentally sound development
of forests in all countries, which include, inter alia, the promotion of
sustainable patterns of production and consumption, the eradication of poverty
and the promotion of food security.

     (b)   Specific financial resources should be provided to developing
countries with significant forest areas which establish programmes for the
conservation of forests including protected natural forest areas.  These
resources should be directed notably to economic sectors which would stimulate
economic and social substitution activities.

8.   (a)   Efforts should be undertaken towards the greening of the world. 
All countries, notably developed countries, should take positive and
transparent action towards reforestation, afforestation and forest
conservation, as appropriate.

     (b)   Efforts to maintain and increase forest cover and forest
productivity should be undertaken in ecologically, economically and socially
sound ways through the rehabilitation, reforestation and re-establishment of
trees and forests on unproductive, degraded and deforested lands, as well as
through the management of existing forest resources.

     (c)   The implementation of national policies and programmes aimed at
forest management, conservation and sustainable development, particularly in
developing countries, should be supported by international financial and
technical cooperation, including through the private sector, where

                 (d)   Sustainable forest management and use should be carried out in
accordance with national development policies and priorities and on the basis
of environmentally sound national guidelines.  In the formulation of such
guidelines, account should be taken, as appropriate and if applicable, of
relevant internationally agreed methodologies and criteria.

     (e)   Forest management should be integrated with management of adjacent
areas so as to maintain ecological balance and sustainable productivity.

     (f)   National policies and/or legislation aimed at management,
conservation and sustainable development of forests should include the
protection of ecologically viable representative or unique examples of
forests, including primary/old-growth forests, cultural, spiritual,
historical, religious and other unique and valued forests of national

     (g)   Access to biological resources, including genetic material, shall
be with due regard to the sovereign rights of the countries where the forests
are located and to the sharing on mutually agreed terms of technology and
profits from biotechnology products that are derived from these resources.

     (h)   National policies should ensure that environmental impact
assessments should be carried out where actions are likely to have significant
adverse impacts on important forest resources, and where such actions are
subject to a decision of a competent national authority.

9.   (a)   The efforts of developing countries to strengthen the management,
conservation and sustainable development of their forest resources should be
supported by the international community, taking into account the importance
of redressing external indebtedness, particularly where aggravated by the net
transfer of resources to developed countries, as well as the problem of
achieving at least the replacement value of forests through improved market
access for forest products, especially processed products.  In this respect,
special attention should also be given to the countries undergoing the process
of transition to market economies.

     (b)   The problems that hinder efforts to attain the conservation and
sustainable use of forest resources and that stem from the lack of alternative
options available to local communities, in particular the urban poor and poor
rural populations who are economically and socially dependent on forests and
forest resources, should be addressed by Governments and the international

     (c)   National policy formulation with respect to all types of forests
should take account of the pressures and demands imposed on forest ecosystems
and resources from influencing factors outside the forest sector, and
intersectoral means of dealing with these pressures and demands should be

10.  New and additional financial resources should be provided to developing
countries to enable them to sustainably manage, conserve and develop their
forest resources, including through afforestation, reforestation and combating
deforestation and forest and land degradation. 

11.  In order to enable, in particular, developing countries to enhance their
endogenous capacity and to better manage, conserve and develop their forest
resources, the access to and transfer of environmentally sound technologies
and corresponding know-how on favourable terms, including on concessional and
preferential terms, as mutually agreed, in accordance with the relevant
provisions of Agenda 21, should be promoted, facilitated and financed, as

12.  (a)   Scientific research, forest inventories and assessments carried
out by national institutions which take into account, where relevant,
biological, physical, social and economic variables, as well as technological
development and its application in the field of sustainable forest management,
conservation and development, should be strengthened through effective
modalities, including international cooperation.  In this context, attention
should also be given to research and development of sustainably harvested
non-wood products.

     (b)   National and, where appropriate, regional and international
institutional capabilities in education, training, science, technology,
economics, anthropology and social aspects of forests and forest management
are essential to the conservation and sustainable development of forests and
should be strengthened.

     (c)   International exchange of information on the results of forest and
forest management research and development should be enhanced and broadened,
as appropriate, making full use of education and training institutions,
including those in the private sector.

     (d)   Appropriate indigenous capacity and local knowledge regarding the
conservation and sustainable development of forests should, through
institutional and financial support and in collaboration with the people in
the local communities concerned, be recognized, respected, recorded, developed
and, as appropriate, introduced in the implementation of programmes.  Benefits
arising from the utilization of indigenous knowledge should therefore be
equitably shared with such people.

13.  (a)   Trade in forest products should be based on non-discriminatory and
multilaterally agreed rules and procedures consistent with international trade
law and practices.  In this context, open and free international trade in
forest products should be facilitated.

     (b)   Reduction or removal of tariff barriers and impediments to the
provision of better market access and better prices for higher value-added
forest products and their local processing should be encouraged to enable
producer countries to better conserve and manage their renewable forest

     (c)   Incorporation of environmental costs and benefits into market
forces and mechanisms, in order to achieve forest conservation and sustainable
development, should be encouraged both domestically and internationally.

     (d)   Forest conservation and sustainable development policies should
be integrated with economic, trade and other relevant policies.

     (e)   Fiscal, trade, industrial, transportation and other policies and
practices that may lead to forest degradation should be avoided.  Adequate
policies, aimed at management, conservation and sustainable development of
forests, including, where appropriate, incentives, should be encouraged.

14.  Unilateral measures, incompatible with international obligations or
agreements, to restrict and/or ban international trade in timber or other
forest products should be removed or avoided, in order to attain long-term
sustainable forest management.

15.  Pollutants, particularly air-borne pollutants, including those
responsible for acidic deposition, that are harmful to the health of forest
ecosystems at the local, national, regional and global levels should be


Locking up the American land proceed non-stop

June 17, 2008

The efforts by the Greens, the US Congress and the Administration to continue locking up the American land proceed non-stop.  Today the House “easily approved” three more Wilderness bills.

* Tom Udall’s (D-NM) HR 2632 created 16,000 acres of new Wilderness in n.e. NM.

* Jim Costa (D-CA) and Devin Nunes (R?-CA) were able to add 113,500 acres of new Wilderness in two areas in the southern Sierra with HR 3022.

* Mary Bono’s (R?-CA) HR 3682 created 41,000 additional acres of Wilderness in four areas, and just for good measure created 31 miles of new Wild & Scenic Rivers.

“And the beat goes on.”

Previously the House had approved new Wilderness bills for Oregon and West Virginia and recently the Senate’s omnibus multi-bill land grab package created the long-delayed Washington state Wild Sky Wilderness.  Bush quickly signed that omnibus monstrosity.

The gates are wide open for all these land grabs with no more than a handful of Republicans strongly fighting them.  And of course purported Republicans are dropping their own Federal land grab bills left and right.  Even the efforts of such strict Constitutionalists and pro-property rights Congressmen as Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) to simply demand that there be recorded roll call votes on these land grabs and lock-ups have met resistance from Republican leaders.  A new form of stealth bomber — bombing the American people under suspension of the rules, with practically no debate, no amendments and an unrecorded voice vote.

At the rate that private lands and resources are being acquired by Fed, state, county and local governments — and much more private land regulated or tied up in Bush administration “partnerships,” perpetual conservation easements, and “cooperative” conservation agreements  — and the government lands then locked up in non-use Wilderness or quasi-Wilderness areas — America is already on its way to becoming a Third World country.  Then Congress won’t have to bother to pass Climate Control legislation because there won’t be much economic activitiy to control.


June 17, 2008

November 1, 2007
H.R. 2262 – Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007
(Rep. Rahall (D) WV and 62 cosponsors)
The Administration supports the environmentally responsible development of hardrock minerals on public lands and would like to work with Congress to update the Mining Law, including the authorization of production payments and administrative penalties. The Administration also believes that any legislative solution must be accomplished in a way that provides a reasonable level of certainty to the industry while pursuing goals to protect our environment. The Administration believes that royalty provisions should be prospective, should avoid constitutional concerns, and should be set at a level that does not threaten the continued, reliable domestic mineral production on which this Nation relies.
The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 2262 because the bill imposes a royalty on claims where property rights already have been vested, could reduce the continued domestic production of hardrock minerals, restates and expands some environmental standards and permitting requirements that are unnecessary and redundant, and establishes new public participation standards rather than utilizing existing and well-established processes to engage the public. If H.R. 2262 were presented to the President in its current form, his senior advisors would recommend he veto the bill.
While the Administration supports the establishment of a production payment system, the Administration has serious concerns about the royalty structure provided in Title I of the bill.
The royalty structure in H.R. 2262 will likely generate Takings Clause challenges because it fails to take into consideration property rights relating to properly maintained claims established prior to enactment of the bill. For any claimant who has a vested property interest prior to production, application of a royalty on production could result in a claim for a compensable taking under the Constitution.
In addition, Title I eliminates the issuance of patents for applications filed after September 30, 1994. Eliminating patenting authority has the potential to expand Federal liability by requiring that the Federal government retain ownership of all lands mined under the bill.
Title III restates and expands existing environmental standards and permitting requirements.
The Administration finds some of these provisions unnecessary and redundant. For example, the non-impairment standard in Section 309 greatly expands the scope of existing environmental requirements and could result in an increase in litigation. Hardrock mining operators on public lands already are required to comply with a number of state and Federal statutes including the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Endangered Species Act, Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and National Historic Preservation Act.
The Administration believes that existing statutes and related regulations provide sufficient authority to regulate mining operations.
Through NEPA, FLPMA, and other land management statutes, Congress also established a role for members of the public and structured a process by which the public could provide input about proposed governmental actions. This structured process has served the government and the public well. Section 504 in Title V of H.R. 2262, by contrast, would give an individual the ability to unduly block Federal actions outside these well established public participation processes.
Finally, Section 506 should be revised to give the Department of the Interior and Department of Justice sufficient authority and flexibility to properly enforce the law.
The Administration looks forward to working with the Congress to address these and other concerns as the legislative process moves forward.
* * * * *
For more information, access the Committee on Natural Resources’ Minority website at:”
# # #
Steve Hansen
Director of Communications
Republican Staff
U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources
1329 Longworth HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-7749

About Myself

June 15, 2008

Just a little about myself.
I have been a small scale “ GOLD “ miner for many years. I own several small 20ac. mining claims in New Mexico.
I have studied the 1866 and 1872 mining laws rules and regulations and traced the beginning of mining in what is known as the Western United States today.
Many people do not understand or wish to understand the importance of even the smallest mining operation in the U.S.!
There are so many misconceptions of the mining industry published widely on the internet and TV.
I hope that I can give my readers the truth about the mining industry and dispel some of the myths and outright lies being published today.
And show the great importance mining plays in our everyday lives.
Truth is;

“ If it is not grown or mined, we don’t have it ! “